If you are homeless, if you are poor, don’t look for help from large housing associations

The think tank, the Policy Exchange, has just published a report on the future of housing associations.  It calls for housing associations to be given the ‘freedom’ to set rents and select their own tenants.  In other words they will be able to ignore the needs of a locality, not take the poorest into their homes, and to be able to charge whatever they like. They could ignore homes for rent and just build housing to sell.

The ‘upside’ for this would be that they would no longer need government grant (down around 80% since the mid 1980s anyway) and they would be able to build 100,000 homes each year.

Why is this report important? Because the Policy Exchange has the ear of government.

The reality this is increasingly happening, with so-called ‘affordable rents’ now beyond the means of many who, even those in work, have to rely on housing benefit subsidy.

The real problem for me is that social housing is meant to be there for those who can’t compete in the market.  Who will house the poor? Who will house those with complex needs?

These large housing associations have been built on the back of public finances – grant and housing benefit.  There must be a new settlement but not one that allows them to opt out of responsibility for those for whom they were founded.

If this is what might happen, councils should immediately end their preferential arrangements with these large housing associations and turn to smaller, community-based associations to build the homes that local people need.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s